The CT Editorial “A social licence for big tech has merit” advocates legislation making tech & media giants subject to a “social licence” making them totally “responsible” for everything they publish.
The CT Editorial “A social licence for big tech has merit” advocates legislation making tech & media giants subject to a “social licence” making them totally “responsible” for everything they publish.
ronchapman.substack.com
Why aren’t ALL publishers responsible for what they publish now? Natural law obliges everyone to accept responsibility for everything they do & say. WHY isn’t that a requirement in Australia?
The CT Editorial “A social licence for big tech has merit” advocates legislation making tech & media giants subject to a “social licence” making them totally “responsible” for everything they publish.
The CT Editorial “A social licence for big…
The CT Editorial “A social licence for big tech has merit” advocates legislation making tech & media giants subject to a “social licence” making them totally “responsible” for everything they publish.
Why aren’t ALL publishers responsible for what they publish now? Natural law obliges everyone to accept responsibility for everything they do & say. WHY isn’t that a requirement in Australia?