The CT Editorial “A social licence for big tech has merit” advocates legislation making tech & media giants subject to a “social licence” making them totally “responsible” for everything they publish.

Why aren’t ALL publishers responsible for what they publish now? Natural law obliges everyone to accept responsibility for everything they do & say. WHY isn’t that a requirement in Australia?

The Canberra Times Editorial “A social licence for big tech has merit” advocates legislation making tech & media giants subject to a “social licence” making them totally “responsible” for everything they publish.

Question: Why aren’t ALL publishers responsible for what they publish now? Natural law automatically obliges everyone to accept responsibility for everything they do & say. WHY isn’t that natural law requirement applicable in Australia?

The short answer is that this nation has been hijacked by a criminal cabal that subjects Australians to unlawful belligerent occupation by its corporate tentacles, namely corporate governments, judiciaries, Police & security forces etc, covertly supported by other privately owned corporate entities like banks, newspapers & many other media and business conglomerates & NGOs. 

That means that the Canberra Times, which is one of those corporations, is gaslighting its readers into believing that corporate government legislation (which has no more lawful basis than internal company directives by Woolworths, Coles or Harvey Norman) should be foisted upon the population to further suppress free speech & the dissemination of ideas & opinions.

Rightly understood, this Editorial is an integral part of the problem, NOT the solution. Why? Because it pretends that the existing situation is valid & advocates more of it.

This Editorial exemplifies the problem because the Canberra Times is a corporation i.e. a dead entity that has no real existence & no natural law rights. YET this NON human, non- Australian faceless facade purports to tell Canberrans what to think & how to act; AND does so with impunity because the unlawful legal system that enables its existence & privileged propaganda status, also enables it to pontificate about the rights of actual human Australians who DO have natural law rights & responsibilities. 

So spare us the lectures, PLEASE…

Incidentally: WTF is climate denialism? No one denies that our climate exists. Nor does any sane individual deny that it constantly changes.

Sincerely,