Garry Linnell (Hell on earth is good enough for our worst offenders, CT, 9/9/23, p.17) says Martin Bryant’s “indiscriminate shooting spree left 35 dead, dozens injured and millions heartbroken. Consecutive life sentences didn’t seem commensurate with the cold brutality of Bryant’s crimes. Barely human, he had forfeited the right to be treated as such”.
I beg to differ.
The archetypal Port Arthur psy-op in Tasmania in 1996 set the agenda for all subsequent Anglo-US “lone nut massacres” because it traumatised a nation and was immediately successful in having Australians surrender their guns to the government.
There is reason to think the Port Arthur massacre was planned as early 1987 when, after a specially called Premier's meeting in Hobart in December 1987, the New South Wales Labour Premier, Mr. Barry Unsworth stated, "there would be no effective gun control in Australia until there was a massacre in Tasmania"
Arguably the Port Arthur Massacre was Australia's 911. Martin Bryant didn’t have the IQ, psychological, physical, technical or planning capability to perform ANY PART of the Port Arthur Black-Op. HE WAS THE PATSY.
At the time of the Port Arthur massacre, the Tasmanian police in conjunction with ASIO and Australian federal authorities were running an anti-terrorist training exercise. The "coincidences" are uncanny. Fortuitously they also had on hand a 22 body refrigerated mortuary truck.
The only "messy" aftermath in relation to the Port Arthur Massacre was the survival of the patsy, Martin Bryant, an intellectually handicapped young man with an IQ of 66 whose mental and emotional age of a 13 year had required that he have a legally appointed guardian. Martin Bryant was kept in solitary confinement in hospital for months until the authorities and a Tavistock psychiatrist, managed to force him to plead guilty for crimes he had no physical, intellectual or emotional ability to commit.
By getting Bryant’s mother and sister to threaten to commit suicide and not see him any more the Tasmanian state and Australian federal authorities were finally able to abort court proceedings and incarcerate Martin Bryant without trial, seemingly forever, and immediately confiscate all guns held by Australians. The Australian media supported the governments' story and totally demonised Martin Bryant. The complicit journalists and their superiors involved will have much karma to expunge for their part in this demonic affair.
Some relevant web articles about the Port Arthur terror massacre, successfully hosted by the Tasmanian state and Australian federal governments and their henchmen, in order to force Australians to give up their guns, are listed at End Note 1. Some of the unexplained discrepancies in the Port Arthur case are listed at End Note 2.
The official government narrative about Port Arthur was that one man (with an IQ of 66 and no training in the use of guns) supposedly shot and killed 35 people and wounded 21 others. That feat, had it been true, would have been phenomenal, even without considering the incredible accuracy and speed with which the shooting was carried out. But there were two shooters and at least one of them was probably a top Israeli military marksman.
The late Joe Vialls’ analysis of the skills demonstrated in the Port Arthur shooting is instructive.
Quoting:
“In the Broad Arrow Cafe the shooter fired at an average range of twelve feet, where a tiny aim-off error of three degrees is enough to ensure that a bullet completely misses a target the size of a human head.
Readers are invited to prove to themselves just how small an error that is, by laying two twelve-foot long pieces of string flat on the floor alongside of each other, with the far ends four inches apart. That helps put things into perspective, doesn't it?
Scientific terms such as killed- to-injured ratio and kill-rate are enough to bore most readers to death, but in order to fully comprehend the enormity of the media lies about the massacre, and expose the planned nature of the operation it is essential information. The killed-to-injured ratio is used to calculate reliably how many injured survivors should be expected for every person killed for a given number of rounds fired. Even assault rounds as powerful as those fired by the Colt AR15 can only ensure a one-shot kill if the target is hit in the head, a six by six inch target: or in the heart, a ten by ten inch target. Together these areas form between one fifth and one seventh of the over-all body target areas, so for every person killed there will be between five and seven injured, expressed as "1 to 5" and "1 to 7".
The records show that a total of 32 people were shot in the Broad Arrow Cafe, so at best we would expect 4 dead and 28 injured, or at worst 6 dead and 26 injured. These are very reliable military figures based on hard science, but the actual figures in the Broad Arrow Cafe were 20 dead and 12 injured - an incredible inverted ratio of 1.66 to 1, or nearly two dead for every one injured.
Special forces train continuously for months on end to achieve a ratio as high as this, which lies far beyond the abilities of regular soldiers, and is an absolute scientific impossibility for an intellectually impaired registered invalid.
Media apologists desperately trying to protect their obscene "lone nut" legend will scream foul at this point and claim that flukes happen. No they do not. About seven months ago a trained Israeli soldier went beserk in Hebron and fired a complete thirty-shot magazine of ammunition from an identical Colt AR15 into a crowd of Palestinians at the same range. His thirty high velocity bullets injured nine and killed no-one at all. This Israeli example helps to drive home the absolute lunacy of crafted media insinuations that Martin Bryant was a registered invalid who suddenly metamorphosed into the lethal equivalent of a fully trained and highly disciplined US Navy 'SEAL'.
Next we come to the kill-rate which refers to the speed at which people are killed, thereby reflecting the skill, coordination, and accuracy of the shooter. It is accepted by all the authorities in Tasmania that immediately after the shooter entered the Broad Arrow Cafe he killed his first 12 victims in 15 seconds, a claim apparently opposed by some sporting shooters in Tasmania because of the seemingly impossible speed and lethal efficiency. This is a very reasonable objection so long as those shooters remain media-fixated on Martin Bryant, but there is nothing impossible about such a high kill-rate at the hands of a top special forces shooter operating at peak efficiency.
The first thing special forces do when entering an enclosed area containing superior numbers is lay down very fast accurate fire designed to kill as many hostiles as possible, thus gaining absolute control of the area in record time and minimising the risk of injury to themselves; and because hostiles frequently wear body armour protecting the heart area, special forces are trained to aim instinctively for the smaller head target. Following these unpublished protocols precisely, the shooter at Port Arthur gained absolute control of the Broad Arrow Cafe in fifteen seconds flat, killing most of his victims with a single shot to the head.
To even suggest that Martin Bryant, whose proven weapons handling experience was limited to a single-shot Webley Osprey air rifle could have caused this carnage is absurd. When the shooter entered the Broad Arrow Cafe full of people sitting at tables and fired the first shot, everyone inside reacted instinctively to the huge muzzle blast (noise) of the AR15, but each reacted in a different way, some just turning their heads while others moved physically, temporarily obscuring yet more diners and shielding them from the line of fire. At the same time the barrel of the AR15 was recoiling upwards through about five degrees of arc as it cycled another round into the breech, throwing the muzzle off target.
In a millisecond the cage was full of targets moving in at least ten different directions while the muzzle of the AR15 was still recoiling upwards from the first shot. But despite the enormous difficulties and the complex target trigonometry involved, the shooter controlled the recoil and shot 12 moving and partially obscured targets at the rate of one every 1.25 seconds. Nor did he trip over any obstructions, indicating that this professional shooter's face was seen in the Broad Arrow Cafe by staff some time earlier, during his final reconnaissance when he studied the layout to ensure no hiccups occurred during the operation. There were no hiccups. Ninety seconds after entering the Broad Arrow Cafe the shooter departed, leaving thirty two Australians and others lying on the floor, twenty of them dead.
All of these hard scientific facts were deliberately excluded by the frenzied media pack and not one attempt was made to establish the real identity of the shooter. Long blonde hair did not prove that the shooter was Martin Bryant, and the media somehow forgot to remind the Australian public that long wigs are the most common form of basic disguise ever used. In the Broad Arrow Cafe a long wig would also have been necessary to conceal the ear protection worn by the shooter. Firing more than thirty high velocity AR15 rounds in that hollow confined space produced as much concussive blast as a pair of stun grenades; sufficient concussion to severely impair the shooter's spatial orientation (and thus aim) unless wearing ear protectors or combat communications headphones. Readers are cautioned not to try proving this point themselves if they value their ear-drums and long-term hearing ability.
Official accounts are hazy about what happened next, but it is confirmed that most of those killed thereafter were shot with the Belgian FN, a heavier assault weapon which has a completely different weight and balance from the Colt AR15 and fires a round producing more than twice the recoil.
But despite switching between weapons with very different handling characteristics, and shifting from close to intermediate range, the shooter constantly maintained an awesome inverted killed-to-wounded ratio. Overall the massacre produced 35 dead and 22 injured for a final killed-to-wounded ratio of 1.60 to 1, almost identical to the 1.66 to 1 ratio in the Broad Arrow Cafe. To say the shooter was consistent would be the understatement of the year.
In layman terms, in an average shooting the 35 people who were killed at Port Arthur should have been accompanied by between 175 and 245 injured survivors; very similar ratios to the American McDonalds and other random massacres. Instead there were only 22, the trademark of a highly trained combat shooter. It is only when accurately analyzed in this cold scientific way that the monstrous nature of the media story can be exposed for what it really is: a creative lie every bit as loathsome as that fashioned by the British media when WPC Yvonne Fletcher was shot in the back from an American multinational building during 1984, but where the media grovelled obsequiously in front of powerful international patrons and lobbies and conspired to pervert the course of justice by blaming the Libyans instead of the Americans.
The professional shooter in Tasmania presented us with a final display of his unquestioned prowess when tourist Linda White and her boyfriend Mick approached Seascape Cottage on the Port Arthur road in a small four-wheel drive vehicle, shortly after the massacre in the Broad Arrow Cafe. Both saw the shooter aim and Linda White felt the wind of the first round as it passed her cheek and shattered the driver's window next to her head. The shooter corrected his aim and the second round hit Linda White in the arm, just to the right of the heart target area, The third round killed the engine and stopped the vehicle."
"In this his ultimate demonstration of combat shooting skill the shooter fired one sighting shot at a fast-moving target [vehicle] of unknown speed from an unsupported free-standing firing position, the most difficult of all; instantly and accurately compensated for vehicle speed and weapon recoil with the same blinding speed as the computer gunsight of an F14 Tomcat, then disabled both driver and vehicle with shots two and three. This man might have been an indispensable asset stopping speeding car-bombers in Beirut, but his professional skills were far too conspicuous for Port Arthur."
In the view of this author [Vialls] these were the last shots fired by the professional before he (or they) smoothly extracted from the Tasman Peninsula and then from Australia, leaving the patsy Martin Bryant down the track at Seascape holding the baby.
The trail to Seascape Cottage had been meticulously laid. In Martin Bryant's car at the tollbooth was a combat shotgun, a bag of ammo for the Belgian FN and, very conveniently, Martin Bryant's passport. Then there was Linda White's disabled four wheel drive on the Arthur Highway and a stolen BMW burning in the grounds of Seascape to mark the way, and just in case all these clues were not enough for the Tasmanian Police, an anonymous caller to police headquarters in Hobart advised the authorities that the man holed up in Seascape was probably Martin Bryant. Short of erecting a pink neon sign reading "THIS WAY TO PATSY" the professional or professionals seem to have thought of everything.
There were no eyewitnesses who could positively identify Martin Bryant at Port Arthur because an Australian newspaper circulated his photograph nationwide, thereby totally corrupting any and all police lineups, photo boards, or controlled shopping mall parades.
All the eyewitnesses could legally claim was a "tall man with long blonde hair", which was no impediment to the media who tried and convicted Martin Bryant in less than two days, in one of the most blatant and disgusting displays of media abuse ever seen.
So Bryant the patsy was firmly in place and Seascape was swiftly surrounded by armed police from Tasmania and Victoria, most of whom must have been very puzzled as the siege continued through the night, If we are to believe media reports (difficult, I know) Martin Bryant fired 250 rounds during the siege period but hit nothing at all, which is exactly what one would expect of someone whose prior experience was limited to a Webley Osprey air rifle.
If the professional shooter had fired 250 rounds from Seascape Cottage during the siege, his awesome killed-to-wounded ratio would have resulted in a police funeral cortege stretching from the Tasman Peninsula to Hobart.
It is beyond doubt that many of the armed police noticed Bryant's wild undisciplined performance at Seascape bore absolutely no resemblance at all to that of the deadly shooter at port Arthur and some must have told their senior officers about it, though it seems they were ignored or simply told to shut up. The media had its man, the feeding frenzy was in full swing and the police were not going to be allowed to spoil a lucrative politically-correct story by telling the truth.
…
In order to present even a shell of a case against Martin Bryant the prosecution needed valid identification by witnesses, but all eyewitness statements were corrupt. In addition they needed the weapons used in the massacre ballistically, cross-matched to bullets found in the victims at Port Arthur, either in Martin Bryant's possession or bearing his fingerprints. They had neither.
Nor were Bryant's fingerprints found at the Broad Arrow Cafe where he is alleged to have eaten lunch immediately before the massacre.
…
despite the severe disadvantage of his intellectual impairment, Bryant kept to his story in the face of tremendous pressure from police interrogators and psychiatrists to admit the enormity of his alleged crimes. He continued to refuse to do so and at the formal hearing on 30th September 1996 pleaded not guilty to all seventy two charges.
At that precise point in time the prosecution knew it had a very serious problem. Martin Bryant was refusing to roll over and there was absolutely no hard evidence at all linking him to the murders at Port Arthur, a fact that would very quickly become obvious if the case was allowed to proceed to trial in front of twelve alert Tasmanian jurors. About the only thing that might save the day was a false confession of the kind beaten out of the Birmingham Six and the Guildford Four by the British police, but by then Bryant was in prison where his screams might attract attention. With the media pack outside its doors baying for blood, government had to do something but had few options. Perhaps heavy pressure could be exerted on a third party to extract a confession from Bryant?
Shortly afterwards, according to Tasmanian reporter Mike Bingham, Martin Bryant's mother Carleen, unable to face the stress of a public trial, paid a visit to Bryant at Risdon Prison and told him that if he did not plead guilty, she and his (Bryant's) younger sister Lindy would commit suicide and he would never see them again. Bingham later wrote that he doubted this was the reason for Martin Bryant then changing his plea to guilty on all charges, but who does Bingham think he is kidding apart from himself? Later, when she understood how she had been manipulated, Martin Bryant's mother Carleen, tried to uncover the truth and help her son but to no avail.
Bryant's mum and sister were probably the only people in the world who would still talk to him, and he had just been told that if he didn't plead guilty they wouldn't be talking to him ever again, and furthermore he would also be directly responsible for their deaths, Carleen Bryant's threat achieved in days what the police interrogators and psychiatrists had failed to achieve in months. Martin Bryant loved his mum and sister and wanted to see both of them again, something that would only happen if he could stop them committing suicide. Clearly Martin Bryant pleaded guilty to save the lives of his mum and sister.
If Bingham's claim is correct, applying such enormous psychological pressure was mental cruelty, every bit as coercive as the physical abuse handed out to the Birmingham Six and Guildford Four by the British Police. But because Martin Bryant was a registered invalid with impaired intellectual functions, the way that psychological blackmail was used to force a false confession out of him was almost certainly as illegal as the physical methods used by the British police, leaving the way open for Bryant to withdraw his false confession and lodge an appeal.
… If Seascape had been located in California or Texas, Martin Bryant would unquestionably have been shot dead the split-second he left the building. It was only the iron discipline exercised by the Tasmanian and Victorian police special operations groups at the scene which allowed Martin Bryant to be taken into custody alive. All of those armed officers deserve the highest praise for their restraint in what must have been perceived as an extremely dangerous situation.
… Logic indicates that a limited number of Australian citizens or residents colluded in the massacre, if only in terms of forward reconnaissance and setting Martin Bryant up for the professionals.
Found at: http://members.iinet.net.au/~nedwood/bryant.html
And: http://www.despatch.cth.com.au/Misc/martinbryant/bryant.htm
And: http://members.iinet.net.au/~nedwood/bryant2.html.
Joe vials concluded:
‘nineteen of the twenty dead in the Broad Arrow Café were killed with single shots to the head fired from the gunman’s right hip. [Ron: Martin Bryant was left handed]. In total only 29 rounds were fired in the Café, killing twenty and wounding another twelve. This was a staggering technical achievement, a feat so far beyond the known capabilities of an intellectually impaired invalid like Bryant, that it beggars the imagination.
Compare this deadly accuracy with the performance of experienced Irish Loyalist gunman Torrens Knight, who in company with one other, used a total of 120 rounds to kill eight and injure another eleven in the Catholic Rising Sun pub at Greysteel, Northern Ireland, during 1993. Only two of the victims were hit in the head, and most of the rounds missed completely, burying themselves in the furniture and walls.
Anyone deluded enough to suggest that intellectually impaired Martin Bryant was three times as accurate as two of the top Loyalist shooters in Northern Ireland, should probably make an appointment with his or her psychiatrist as a matter of urgency.’
http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/REINFORCING-MARTIN-BRYANT-S-GUILT.shtml
The Australian and USraeli state terror organisers learnt a lot from the Port Arthur Massacre. The most important lesson was that the patsy MUST die at the end of the massacre. Had Martin Bryant’s mother realised the truth, which she subsequently did, she would not have assisted the perpetrators to force a false confession from Bryant and that would have brought this government terrorist conspiracy undone.
In addition the state terror perpetrators realised that it is vital to prevent any accurate information about what actually happened becoming public knowledge. That is achieved by cordoning off and quickly concealing or destroying relevant crime scenes and removing and concealing or destroying all evidence. For instance the scrap steel from 911 was removed and sold overseas to China within three weeks and the debris following the micro nuke Bali Bombing was collected and dumped out at sea within three weeks of that bombing.
Such evidence has to be removed without proper forensic examination for obvious reasons. For instance who would accept that cave dwelling Muslims used micro nukes to pulverise huge buildings on 911 or that average Indonesian artisans had constructed the micro nuke needed to create a huge crater and pulverise concrete reinforced buildings in Bali.To maintain the pretense that those bombings were within the capabilities of the designated patsies all contrary evidence had to be hidden or destroyed.
Other obfuscation techniques that have become very common include preventing relevant witness statements from being published or available, and issuing multiple conflicting reports about massacres such that it becomes nearly impossible to know what is genuine and what is concocted.
When concealing and destroying evidence is considered insufficient the Police and government authorities make it a crime for anyone to report anything publicly other than what the police have said. See eg:
I wonder whether this policy will be made retrospective and applied to 911, the Oklahoma City bombing, WACO and all the rest?
End Note 1
Articles on the Port Arthur Massacre
Port Arthur Massacre. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Port-Arthur-Massacre.shtml
And:
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/port_arthur.htm
OFFICIAL MARTIN BRYANT STORY PROVED AN IMPOSSIBLE LIE. See: http://www.whale.to/b/viallspam.html
PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/PHOTOGRAPHIC-EVIDENCE.shtml And:
PROOF OF INNOCENCE. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/PROOF-OF-INNOCENCE.shtml
LACK OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE AT PORT ARTHUR. See:
http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/LACK-OF-FORENSIC-EVIDENCE-AT-PORT-ARTHUR.shtml
And; http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/HARD-SCIENTIFIC-EVIDENCE-AT-PORT-ARTHUR.shtml
And:http://members.iinet.net.au/~nedwood/hard-evidence.html
Oslo and Port Arthur-Massacres-Sold-by-the-Jew-Media-as-LONE-NUT-events See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Ron_71/Oslo-and-Port-Arthur-Massacres-Sold-by-the-Jew-Media-as-LONE-NUT-events.shtml
REINFORCING MARTIN BRYANT'S "GUILT" See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/REINFORCING-MARTIN-BRYANT-S-GUILT.shtml
HARD SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE AT PORT ARTHUR. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/HARD-SCIENTIFIC-EVIDENCE-AT-PORT-ARTHUR.shtml
REINFORCING MARTIN BRYANT'S "GUILT" See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/REINFORCING-MARTIN-BRYANT-S-GUILT.shtml
MARTIN BRYANT GETS A VISITOR. See: See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/MARTIN-BRYANT-GETS-A-VISITOR.shtml
And: Australian Officials Recklessly Endanger Martin Bryant’s Life
http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/Australian-Officials-Recklessly-Endanger-Martin-Bryant-s-Life.shtml
MARTIN BRYANT'S MOTHER SPEAKS OUT. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/MARTIN-BRYANT-S-MOTHER-SPEAKS-OUT.shtml
SPRINGFIELD "SIMULATOR" PROVES PORT ARTHUR A FAKE. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/SPRINGFIELD-SIMULATOR-PROVES-PORT-ARTHUR-A-FAKE.shtml
And: http://members.iinet.net.au/~nedwood/springfield.htmlhttp://members.iinet.net.au/~nedwood/springfield.html
POLITICIANS SHIRK RESPONSIBILITY ON PORT ARTHUR. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/POLITICIANS-SHIRK-RESPONSIBILITY-ON-PORT-ARTHUR.shtml
GOVERNMENT COVER-UP AT PORT ARTHUR. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/GOVERNMENT-COVER-UP-AT-PORT-ARTHUR.shtml
MARTIN BRYANT - THE OTHER STORY. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/MARTIN-BRYANT---THE-OTHER-STORY.shtml
THE PORT ARTHUR MASSACRE 10 YEARS ON THE SECRECY CONTINUES. See: http://abundanthope.net/pages/Political_Information_43/THE-PORT-ARTHUR-MASSACRE-10-YEARS-ON-THE-SECRECY-CONTINUES.shtml
End Note 2
Some of the unexplained discrepancies in the Port Arthur case include:
1 Whoever was on the trigger that fateful day demonstrated professional skills equal to some of the best special forces shooters in the world.
His critical error lay in killing too many people too quickly while injuring far too few, thereby exposing himself for what he was: a highly trained combat shooter probably ranked among the top 20 such specialists in the western world.
2 There was lack of forensic evidence at Port Arthur. There were no tests that matched Martin Bryant's guns and no fingerprint comparisons from the Broad Arrow Cafe.
3 Both the guns Martin Bryant supposedly used were damaged to the point where forensic tests to match cartridges to guns weren't possible. The damage to the guns could have occurred in either of two ways.
(1) A cartridge blowing up in the breach which would mean the user would have a damaged hand which Martin Bryant didn't have.
(2) Deliberate use of explosives remotely detonated, which is a trick learned by special forces to avoid making positive identification impossible. This must have been done somewhere other than where the guns were found at Seascape because, despite a thorough search of the area, some gun parts were never found. The guns shown to the MSM were a reconstructed version with missing pieces supplied from police weapons archives, a fact which was never mentioned in the mass media.
4 No legally valid eye witnesses to the massacre. Out of the few survivors of the massacre who were able to identify the shooter, non were called on to identify Martin Bryant as the shooter. It was explained that these people had been put through enough trauma and their evidence would not be required.
5 Martin Bryant was left handed, the shooter was right handed.
6 Police decoyed away from scene just before shooting began on a "first time in history since records began" hoaxed call to pick up some heroin which turned out to be soap power.
7 Descriptions of the shooter didn't match. Eye witnesses to the shooting describe the shooter as being around 20 with golden blonde hair a few inches below his shoulders which was straight, with rat tails and a heavily pock-marked face.
Martin Bryant was 29, had whitish blonde, slightly curly hair which was just above shoulder length and a clear complexion.
8 Martin Bryant had an IQ of 66 (average IQ 90-110), making it hard to believe that he could have planned and executed the massacre with any degree of efficiency.
9 A refrigerated hearse large enough to hold 22 people was bought before the operation which was considered strange. After the massacre it was disposed of.
10 Martin Bryant underwent trial by media, assumed guilty, human rights abused.
11 Is it significant that no Jews nor Freemacs nor Politicians and their relatives 'were amongst the deads'?
12 Faked "first time ever" video showed overcast sky when the actual massacre happened when the sky was clear.
To this day efforts are still being made to prevent anybody getting a photo of Martin Bryant to compare with the video.
13 The very fact that his back was on fire when he exited Seascape Cottage, and the fact that he came out unarmed, and that he said "Don't shoot, I am the hostage", should have received immense scrutiny.
14 ASIO were on the scene too quickly making it look like they had fore knowledge. How soon was ASIO on the scene after the incident? What is meant by 'ASIO screened out some people'?
15 What Hobart logs of departure were falsified? enroute Melbourne CTR logs, Bankstown secondary arrival log falsified?
Various airport departure and arrival logs were falsified which points to a well co-ordinated escape strategy for the actual shooter and his accomplice.
16 30 year embargo on evidence
Anyone wishing to pursue the matter beyond this point should read the item "Port Arthur - What Next?" printed alongside Joe Vialls' report.
17. The Seascape Siege lasted throughout the night
Martin Bryant said he was the hostage, yet there were two people firing from Seascape. How did these two other people escape from Seascape?
"The siege lasted throughout the night and finally ending with Seascape being caught on fire and Martin Bryant coming out yelling, "don't shoot, I'm the hostage".
"Who was doing the shooting - Martin Bryant or the unknown person who supposedly set the house on fire when Martin fell asleep?"
What was Bryant shooting with?
What was Bryant firing at the police with if both guns were destroyed?
************************
Further discussion:
Seven ASIO (ie Australia’s National Security Intelligence Service) agents were killed during the Port Arthur psy-op. http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=263676
That seems like an extraordinary occurrence, and it was. But the bought and paid for Australian political, police and security services backed up by the totally corrupt, mass media corporations, managed to conceal the truth and achieve the New World Order objective which was to confiscate all guns in private hands in Australia.
Given that the Port Arthur Massacre enabled the Australian government to immediately confiscate ALL guns in private ownership in Australia; and there has been a rash of similar psy-ops in the US, Norway and New Zealand since then, readers may be interested in a detailed report on how an alleged “lone nut gunman” whose IQ of 66 required him to have a legal guardian, was held responsible for the murder of 35 people at Port Arthur on Sunday, 28 April 1996.
This report highlights the complexity and need for many people to be involved in the planning and orchestration of these “lone nut” massacres. It also evidences that the traitorous mass murdering government agents who organise, facilitate and supervise such events sometimes run a risk of receiving instant karma.
Andrew McGregor gives an indication of the complexity of the “exercise” at Port Arthur:
'What did we have at Port Arthur? We had the Tasmania police, the Tasmania police Special Operations Group, the Victoria police Special Operations Group (six members), the NSW police Special Operations Group, the Australian federal police Anti-terror Squad, ASIO, PSCC, the Australian defence forces helicopter pilots and the SAS. It was a bloody big exercise and much of that had to have been organised prior to the event. Three army helicopter pilots to fly the rescue helicopters on the Sunday. They were there prior to the event. The SAS van arrived at the oval to guide in the helicopters. This van indicates the preparedness, as they could not just have been in the area at the time.”
Needless to say, the suppurating secret “exercise” at Port Arthur has not received any honest investigation or mainstream media coverage in Australia nor has it resulted in any of those involved being brought to justice. However, seven “secret service” agents who participated at Port Arthur on that day did experience the fate they planned for others. If those agents or any of them, were there to provide witness statements designed to frame Martin Bryant for this atrocity their testimony was necessarily absent. And of course the dead agents were also unable to add their voices to the government orchestrated public outcry and demand for “gun control”. But Australia's Ashkenazi (KM) controlled mass media overcame that difficulty and the gun confiscation legislation that miraculously appeared in Parliament within two weeks - a feat that almost rivals the production of the Patriot Act in the US Congress within five days of 911.
Of course in 1996 Australians had not yet become used to the “lone nut” gunman syndrome. Today they might be a bit more skeptical. It appears that these “lone-nut gunman” psy-ops are complex and require lots of organisation and manpower. There’s no way that a lone highly skilled military gunman could even begin to organise and carry out one of these massacres unaided. Suggesting that an emotionally limited, socially isolated and mentally challenged or autistic individual, or even an average college or university student, could do it is ludicrous beyond belief. YET, again and again the Anglo-US public apparently swallows these government concocted narratives whole. Of course governments have totally corrupt hordes of mainstream media journalists and commentators pumping out lying cover stories for them, but still anyone believing those stories must have the mental processing ability of an amoeba.
Anyway, here’s a narrative (a report by Andrew Macgregor) that mentions the circumstances in which the seven ASIO agents were murdered by a Mossad gunman. What a joke it must be for the Mossad! They get to kill seven stupid goy secret service agents in Oz and nobody in ASIO, the AFP or the Australian government can say anything about it because that would blow the whole stinking conspiracy wide open. To add insult to injury, presumably ASIO had to PAY for the services of the Mossad gunmen. I imagine that such services don’t come cheap.
Port Arthur Massacre - A Speech by Mr Andrew MacGregor
Sun, 01/06/2008 - 21:4
Thank you all for coming here tonight to listen to me. It has been 6 years since Wendy Scurr and I last spoke here on the Port Arthur massacre, and since then a lot of evidence has turned up that totally disputes everything the media and our governments have stated. It is my belief that we may have some people here who are not aware of what Wendy and I stated last time, so I shall start from the beginning. That's always a good place to start.
For Martin Bryant to have acted in the manner described by our media and the government in murdering 35 people at Port Arthur on the 28th April 1996, there would have been a massive built up of anger and frustration. The Tasmania Police Negotiator, Sgt Terry McCarthy referred to this expectation, but noted that it was entirely absent from Martin Bryant, when Sgt McCarthy was speaking to him during the Siege at Seascape Cottage. Sgt McCarthy made another observation of Martin Bryant. McCarthy stated it was as though he (Martin Bryant) was speaking from a script.
Martin Bryant was speaking from a script. This is what the expert, Sgt Terry McCarthy has stated emphatically, and for his comments and actions in trying to bring out the truth, McCarthy lost his job.
Martin Bryant's girlfriend, Petra Willmott gave us another clue. Petra made two vital statements, (1) that Martin wouldn't hurt a fly, and (2) that Martin was always looking for action. Martin once drove past a motor car accident, and drove around it a couple of times to check it out. Now what Petra was not aware of was the fact that Martin Bryant was not licensed to drive a motor car. If we compare this story with that of Angelo Kessarios from the Midway Newsagency, who knew Martin Bryant when he resided at Copping, and that Bryant used to drive in the early morning, that is prior to 6.00 am to avoid police, but just prior to the Port Arthur massacre, Bryant had lost his fear of being caught by the police. I wonder if this change of behaviour had anything to do with Bryant's friendship with the Tasmania Police's only full-time SOG member, Sgt Michael Charles Dyson.
On Sunday the 28th April 1996, Martin Bryant's journey from New Town to Seascape Cottage was remembered by various witnesses, as though to document this particular trip.
Angelo Kessarios from the Midway Newsagency, Spiros Diamantis from the Sorell Supermarket, a small store, not a giant Coles or Safeway. Then there was Gary King from the Shell Service Station at Forcett, who served Bryant with some coffee between 11 am and midday and Bryant sat in his car and drank that coffee for about 8 to 10 minutes. Now please notice that in each of these incidents where Martin Bryant has been identified, Bryant has actually broken his journey to Seascape Cottage, entered a business premises and has acted in a manner that caused the witness to remember him. Then there was Christopher Hammond at Taranna, where Martin Bryant bought some petrol for the Volvo. Please note here that the petrol did not go into any container, and again the broken journey.
Then there was the witness not called for by the DPP, but who saw Martin Bryant driving the Volvo at Eaglehawk Neck at 11.30 am. And finally we have Jai Nichols who was hitch-hiking from Port Arthur to Hobart, and saw the Volvo drive past him just after he passed the Fox and Hounds Hotel. Then at about 12.30pm Jai saw the Volvo pass him heading back towards Hobart, and he actually saw the Volvo brake, and he thought he had a ride, but the Volvo turned right into Seascape Cottage.
Martin Bryant arrived at Seascape Cottage at approximately 12.30 pm on that Sunday.
Witnesses Andrew Simmons and his wife Lynn were outside of their house opposite Seascape Cottage waiting for a car that was to pick Andrew up for a work Seminar at Swansea, when they both heard two shot emanating from
Seascape at 10.40 am. At this time Martin Bryant is drinking coffee at Forcett as per the witness Gary King.
Doug McCutcheon heard a series of rapidly fired shots emanating from Seascape, possibly 6 - 12 shots between 10.00am and possibly 11.00am. And these shots heard by three or four witnesses, occurred at least 100 minutes before Martin Bryant arrived at Seascape.
Now the DPP, Mr Damian Bugg QC told the Hobart Supreme Court that the shots heard by Andrew and Lynn Simmons killed David and Sally Martin. The fact that Constable Gary Whittle saw Mrs Sally Martin naked, running
around the back yard of Seascape Cottage yelling and screaming, after 2.30 pm, and that the dog was barking, means that Mrs Sally Martin was not shot at 10.40 am. In fact according to a report by Sgt Gerard Dutton, Mrs
Martin died from multiple fractures to the back of her skull, while David Martin was shot twice.
David Martin was shot twice, the shots being heard by Andrew and Lynn Simmons at 10.40 am, when Martin Bryant was 58 kilometres away drinking coffee at the Shell Service Station at Forcett.
I would like to pass by the actual shooting at Port Arthur and go directly to the Siege at Seascape Cottage.
After the shootings at Port Arthur and the kidnapping of Glen Pears, the gunman, and this was not Martin Bryant, drove back to Seascape Cottage,drove across the highway and parked the Volvo facing oncoming traffic outside Seascape and then started to shoot-up the oncoming traffic. One of the first cars that was shot up was driven by a Canadian diplomat Simon Williams, and both Simon and his wife Susanne Williams received wounds from the fractured glass, Mrs Williams losing her left little finger. It has been noted that the Canadian High Commissioner to Australia had visited the Port Arthur Historic Site in the month prior to the massacre.
Now I wish to emphasise here in no small terms that Canada and Australia are major players within the UN treatise on Gun Control, and the move to remove America's 2nd Amendment.
After this shooting spree, the gunman then jumps back into the Volvo, and drives down to the front of Seascape Cottage, and reverses up to the front door. Track marks were clearly visible from later overhead photographs ntaken of Seascape Cottage, showing the tracks made by the Volvo from that position at the front door of Seascape Cottage, to the rear of the cottages on very wet ground, to where the Volvo was parked, and bogged beside some curly willow trees.
At approximately 2.30pm the first two policemen arrive at Seascape; Constable Paul Hyland from Nubeena, the local station and Constable Gary Whittle from Taranna.
Constable Whittle parks the police car at the top of the driveway into Seascape and thus blocks that venue for any escape attempt. Constable Hyland drives his car up the road about 200 metres to the high ground and thus has the best view possible of the area. It is at this stage that Constable Whittle sees a naked female running about in the back yard of Seascape Cottage, yelling and screaming, and this can only be Mrs Sally Martin.
Constable Hyland states that he saw a black-haired person who appeared to be naked at Seascape. Again, Mrs Sally Martin. Constable Hyland also states that whilst he was holding this position on the highway above Seascape; "Two ambulances had driven past me, heading south."
Think about this for a moment. Constable Hyland has been made aware that he has a mass murderer armed with some very high-powered rifles in Seascape Cottage, and yet he permits two ambulances to drive past him andminto range of the killer at Seascape Cottage.
We have only one ambulance where the driver stated that he drove past Seascape Cottage and that was Jim Giffard from Taranna. Jim actually told Wendy Scurr that he had to slow down to avoid colliding with the two police cars that were blocking the highway at Seascape.mIn other words, when the ambulance went past Seascape Cottage, Constable Whittle's police car was in the driveway, and Constable Hyland's police car and another police car were blocking the highway just north of
Seascape Cottage. The other police car belonged to the SOG member, Sgt Andrew Mark Fogarty, the policeman who set fire to the BMW (so as to negate it being used as a get-away vehicle, according to a Tasmania Police
CIB member) and to Seascape Cottage on the following morning. Now what you must remember is that the gunman after shooting all the people at Port Arthur, kidnapping Glean Pears and shooting his companion Zoe Hall, and then driving to Seascape where he shot up several passing cars including the Canadian Diplomat, there is no shooting at this stage. I guess the gunman was having his smoko. I wonder if Const Hyland was aware that the gunman was having his smoko?
Another police-car arrives driven by Constable Pat Allen, and Pat Allen also drives past Seascape Cottage and drops his offsider Perry Caulfield off at the Fox and Hounds Hotel, and then returns to back-up Constable Whittle at the driveway of Seascape Cottage, and at this time, the gunman has finished his smoko and the shooting is back on.
Why was there this break in the shooting???
The gunman at Seascape, or perhaps gunmen, as there were reports of the gunman shooting from two different buildings, and of shots being fired at police whilst those police had the gunman in view, but without seeing the gunman shooting at them. The Tasmania Police alleged that the gunman fired over 250 shots during the siege at Seascape Cottage.
The Tasmania Police however had strict instructions that they were not to shoot the gunman. Deputy Commissioner, later Commissioner Richard McCreadie gave us two explanations as to why the Tasmania Police were not permitted to defend themselves and shoot the gunman
(1) There were very strict rules of engagement
(2) If the police had shot the gunman then that would have required a Coronial inquiry.
Neither of these explanations stand up to scrutiny. However, in one of the police negotiator tapes between Sgt Terry McCarthy and Martin Bryant, we have Bryant talking whilst in another room, somebody fires an SKK rifle. There were in excess of 20 such shots recorded on the Police Negotiator tapes whilst Bryant was talking with Sgt McCarthy. In other words, Martin Bryant is not the gunman.
Who was the gunman at Seascape Cottage?
It was recorded that Martin Bryant's companion inside Seascape Cottage was called 'Rick'. Police and the media have put forward the idea that 'Rick' was actually the hostage, Glen Pears, but that is not correct.
After reading the Police negotiator tape transcripts, we realise that Martin Bryant knows Rick quite well, has met 'Rick's wife', is aware of the family connections and that the family resides in Lauderdale, and that Rick is a top member of the Tasmania Police SOG's. It also becomes obvious that Rick was running the show. Then with other information we were able to identify Rick as being Mick Dyson, or to use his full name and title, Sgt Michael Charles Dyson of the Tasmania Police SOG.
The gunman at Seascape Cottage was Sgt Michael Charles Dyson of the Tasmania Police SOG's.
According to police statements Martin Bryant's photograph was circulated amongst the police SOG's headquarters at about 10.30pm on the Sunday night. In other words, the Tasmania Police had identified 'Jamie' at Seascape as Martin Bryant and besides the photograph would have had a fairly accurate description of him, including his inability with firearms.
With this in mind, when we look at Sup't Bob Fielding's synopsis that the SOG's would have suffered a 30% casualty rate if they had tried to take the gunman, as somewhat ludicrous. Of course, after years of training and preparations for such an event, and the writing of several scenarios similar to 'Die-Hard' films, perhaps for them it was a possibility, but for the last seven years of my police experience, the quickest way to end a siege was to send in a police dog. The SOG however prefer to use firearms and arson.
At 0600 hours on the Monday morning, the local CFA unit is put on alert as per instructions from Sup't Bob Fielding, and stationed itself at the Fox and Hounds Hotel, that is within a kilometre of Seascape Cottage.
At 0747 hours Seascape Cottage is reported to be on fire. In a 'secured' area, a Channel 9 film crew is on the other side of Long Bay filming the action. At 0824 hours, Martin Bryant is observed leaving the burning Seascape Cottage. At 0835 hours Martin Bryant is arrested by members of the SOG.
It took the Tasmania Police SOG's, 11 minutes to arrest a suspected terrorist, Martin Bryant who had emerged from a burning building with his clothes on fire.
Now this is not the record. In the Aramoana Massacre, it took the New Zealand Police anti-terrorist squad three days to locate and kill the gunman. In all 34 hours to locate the gunman in his home, force him out and then put 7 bullets into him, and the gunman David Gray bled to death. And that episode also starred Sgt Michael Charles Dyson of the Tasmania Police SOG
At Seascape, one story is that the 'Arrest Team' had to leave their positions, journey back to the highway, collect their 'anti-ballistic shields, clamber onto an SOG vehicle driven by Sgt Andrew Mark Fogarty, be driven down the driveway of Seascape Skirting Const Whittles police car, dismount from the vehicle, surround the now naked person of Martin Bryant and then arrest him.
Procedures Sir, they must follow procedures.
I have seen films depicting emergency police actions such as these. The films were of the Keystone Cops. Australia has spent Millions of dollars to train our quasi-military police anti-terrorist squads to the highest levels of competency in combating major violent crime, to the level of the Keystone Cops.
Now this concludes the parts of the Port Arthur massacre that featured Martin Bryant. We can prove with the various witness statements that Martin Bryant was not present at the murder of David Martin. We can demonstrate that somebody else and we believe that person was Sgt Michael Charles Dyson who fired at police during the siege of Seascape Cottage, and who we also believe murdered Mrs Sally Martin by smashing the back of her skull in with a very angry blow from the butt of his rifle
The gunman at Port Arthur.
The first sighting of the gunman at Port Arthur was by Gaye Lynd and her companion Vicki, whose van had broken down just outside Seascape Cottage due to overheating, and the girls had stopped and were letting the motor cool down before putting some water into the radiator.
The Volvo sedan complete with surfboard on top pulled up behind their van and the blonde haired driver got out and asked what was wrong. Now the blonde-haired driver must have had a nose for it, and must have smelt the marijuana that Vicki had smoked because he asked if they had any for sale and the two girls sold him a packet for $50 and he paid for it with a $50 note. He also told the girls that he was going to the 'Isle of the Dead' to kill some wasps. Then when the girl's van wouldn't start, he reached inside the van to the battery, juggled with the leads, and said here's your problem, you have a loose lead. The van started and off went the girls.
This was not Martin Bryant, for three obvious reasons.
(1) Martin Bryant did not partake in drugs, including marijuana.
(2) Martin Bryant knew nothing about the electrical system in motor cars.
(3) Martin Bryant knew nothing about the two busloads of American tourists that had arrived just prior at the Port Arthur Historic Site.
How did this person know about the two busloads of American tourists?
Why did this person tell the girls he was going to the Isle of the Dead to kill some wasps?
It is interesting to note that neither of these two girls were given the police Identification board to identify the gunman as Martin Bryant.
The gunman then drives to the tollbooth at the Port Arthur Historic Site, where he again pays the entrance fee with a $50 note. Again, something happens and there is a small commotion and Aileen Kingston has cause to remember the driver, and later identifies the gunman by Martin Bryant's passport photograph, the passport being found by police in the Volvo's glovebox.
The gunman parks the Volvo in the bus carpark. There were some complications here, but the gunman ended up parking the Volvo where he wished to park. He then went into the information office to collect his ferry ticket and discovered that the ferry schedule had been altered.
The gunman then went into the Broad Arrow Café, stood in the queue, with his very heavy 'Prince' sports bag and bulky video camera, bought two drinks and some sandwiches for lunch, went out on the balcony scoffed down the lunch, mumbled a lot to himself, tried to chat up Rebecca McKenna, then still carrying his sports bag and video camera, picked up the tray with his scraps on, tried to re-enter the café, almost lost the tray, had the door held open for him, went inside the café, placed the tray on an empty table, opened up the bag withdrew the AR-15 and started the massacre.
The shooting has now started in the Broad Arrow Café. I would now like to go back to what the gunman said to Gaye Lynd and her friend Vicki at the broken down van outside Seascape Cottage. "I'm going to the Isle of the dead to kill some wasps." What did the gunman say to Rebecca McKenna? "There's a lot of wasps around. There's not many Japs."
So now in the Broad Arrow Café, where the shooting has started and once the patrons realised what was going on they all dived for the only cover they could find. For most, it was on the floor under their tables, except for one man, Anthony Nightingale, a loans officer from the Commonwealth bank at Noble Park. He jumped up and called out to the gunman, "No, no,not here!!!" Apparently Anthony Nightingale was also aware that the ferry was to have been the target. For his actions, Anthony Nightingale was shot in the neck and was killed, and the gunman simply walked around the café shooting his victims in the head as they lay on the floor.
Another of the victims was a former South African Cape Coloured by the name of Tony Kistan, who was a devout Christian, and after fleeing South Africa in 1984 where he was 2IC of the NCA, Nelson Mandela's Communist
Party under the Lithuanian Jew Joe Slovo. After Joe's wife was killed by a letter bomb, and Nelson had decreed that there would be no Cape Coloureds in the NCA, Tony Kistan migrated to Sydney where he joined the Salvation Army. By the way his sister is still a spokeswoman for the South AfricanGun Control Lobby.
The third member of this team, which was killed, was Andrew Bruce Mills, a local who was not a local, but had moved down from Sydney, and resided with his boyfriend in Mornington, outside of Hobart, and his parent' resided in Mornington Victoria.
The only American who was wounded inside the Broad Arrow Café was Dennis Olson, who was with his wife, Mary on their 'honeymoon'. Dennis received shotgun pellet wounds to the face chest and arm. Dennis told a media interview held in the Royal Hobart Hospital that when he returned to America he would be jumping on a soap box to talk about his passion, gun control.
Thus we have two ASIO operatives killed inside the Broad Arrow Café, and a South African Communist Party member. And an American anti-gunner wounded.
Now the gunman on completion of the shooting inside the Broad Arrow Café, reloaded the weapon he was carrying, took his sports bag which contained his other weapons, the AR10 and the Daewoo shotgun, and left Martin Bryant's 'Prince' sports bag and video camera on the table inside the café, and then left the café, shooting in the air to dispel any nearby persons. Wendy Scurr was told by Ashley Law that as she and her companions fled from the Information Centre the gunman fired over their heads.
The gunman then went down to the bus parking area and continued to shoot at persons within that area, killing another four victims. The gunman then left the carpark, in the Volvo, driving towards the tollbooth, where he saw
Nanette Mikac with her two young daughters. The gunman stopped the car and when Nanette Mikac approached the car with her two daughters, he shot them with the AR15.
Mrs Mikac, who was carrying her three year old daughter, with the six year old beside her, and had already fled 600 metres, would have believed that they were being offered assistance, instead they were being lured to their death. What this means is that they had been deliberately selected as murder victims. Why deliberately select a mother and two young daughters out of all the fleeing survivors, why?
Consider this Statement made by CNN's John Raedler based in Sydney. He attended at Port Arthur along with another CNN employee, Hugh Williams of Sydney, but based in Berlin and at home at the time on leave. Johnston's (Superintendent Jack Johnston) explanation of the fate of the Mikacs was the classic 'win-win' sound bite.
This demonstrates that the murder of Nanette Mikac and her two daughters was evaluated as the most powerful tool to be used in the anti-gun propaganda by the media.
The gunman then drove the Volvo to the tollbooth where he parked the Volvo on the grass to the left of the carriageway. Witnesses who had driven up to the tollbooth totally unaware of what had occurred inside Port Arthu saw the BMW and the Volvo parked on either side of the tollbooth. They also saw Mrs Helene Salzmann seated in the front passenger seat of the Volvo, and Mr Robert Salzmann seated in the rear right passenger seat of the Volvo. This is not an error. The witnesses saw the Salzmanns seated not in the BMW but the Volvo. They then saw Robert Salzmann get out of the rear passenger seat of the Volvo and start arguing with the driver of the Volvo, an unarmed person with long blonde hair. They then saw the driver of the Volvo walk around the front of the Volvo, and emerge from the rear of the Volvo carrying a rifle. This rifle could only have been collected from the rear left passenger side of the Volvo, right next to where David Salzmann was seated. They then watched the gunman shoot Robert Salzmann.
The driver of the BMW, Russell Pollard then left the driver's seat of the BMW and walked over to the gunman as if to challenge him, and the gunman then shot Russell Pollard. Mrs Salzmann had by this time got out of the front passenger seat, and simply stood at the rear left passenger door, and the gunman walked up to her and shot her, the bullet passing through her body and then smashing the rear left passenger door window. The gunman then walked over to the BMW dragged Mrs Rose Nixon out of the BMW and then shot her.
Now why did the BMW after the people inside this car witness the murder of Mrs Mikac and her two daughters drive to the tollbooth, and stop at the entrance to the Port Arthur Historic Site? Why didn't they flee for their lives as other people had done? Why did the Salzmanns leave the BMW and get into the Volvo sedan with a known killer? They had seen the gunman kill the Mikacs, so why did they get into the Volvo?
Could it have been that since they were 'Intelligence' agents, and were part of the plan that they thought they were invulnerable? Apparently so.
The Port Arthur Massacre as a planned anti-terrorist exercise was a major cock-up. The original plan called for the killing of American tourists on the ferry, and then beaching the ferry at Seascape Cottage. They didn't take into account that the ferry schedule had a fortnight prior changed from the summer schedule to the winter schedule. This would have left the Volvo at Port Arthur with all of it's clues intact, such as Martin Bryant's passport.
But there was also a required 'hostage' to explain the presence of 'Rick' at Seascape Cottage with Martin Bryant. So how could the gunman steal the BMW and thus leave the Volvo behind at the tollbooth without murdering the occupants? He couldn't, and thus they had to die. Did it matter to the gunman and his controller that these people were part of the 'anti-terrorist' exercise? Not on your Nellie. They were expendable.
Thus whoever it was that ran the Port Arthur Massacre, and to make it easy for everybody to understand, I shall call them ASIO, though it could have been any Federal Government Intelligence Body, had a major catastrophe on their hands. Not only had things not gone according to plan, but they had now lost 7 of their operatives
One of the video-tapes released to the media after Martin Bryant's sentencing hearing showed a person running down to the bus car-park outside the Broad Arrow Cafe whilst three men were having a chat on the verandah. Joe Vialls pointed out that this was a fake video because it supposedly showed Martin Bryant running towards the buses and that Bryant's head had been super imposed on the running figure.
On a careful examination of this video-tape we were able to identify the three men on the verandah, once we realised that they were part of the exercise. The first to be identified was Hans Overbeeke because of his white Wellington boots he was wearing. The second to be identified was Constable Justin Noble of the BCI (Bureau of Criminal Intelligence) that most corrupt Federal Police Body, and the third man puffing away on his cigarette was identified by 'shooter's news' as Joe Vialls.
This also explains just how Joe Vialls knew that the gunman's pitted face was caused by smallpox scars. Joe Vialls knew and trained Ben Overbeeke, for the part of the gunman for the Port Arthur Massacre.
What I have given you all here tonight is just a scant run-down on thePort Arthur massacre. There are so many facets of this event that I have not touched upon, the planning and preparation of the massacre, the many
people involved with the massacre from police, bureaucrats, intelligence operatives, including the professional witnesses, the lies and the media manipulation
I hope I have raised the level of awareness, and to demonstrate that awareness, I hope that you will now ask some questions of me, so that I can address some of your concerns about the Port Arthur massacre.”
Found at: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/01/06/port-arthur-massacre-speech-mr-andrew-macgregor
Arguably Thomas Jefferson got it right when he said:
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
Perhaps Jefferson could have added that as most threats to the life and freedom of individuals within society stem from governments, the right of governments to arm their employees and agents should be restricted and closely monitored by the individuals within the societies they supposedly serve.
Ron
Discussion about this post
No posts